Budget freezes salaries
Tasleem Mawji
Ryersonian Staff
Uploaded on 4/6/2010 4:57:32 PM


President Sheldon Levy said Ontario’s two-year public sector wage freeze was a surprise and is unfair to non-unionized employees at Ryerson.

The 2010 Ontario budget proposed legislation that freezes the wages of non-unionized public sector workers in the Ontario Public Service, Hydro One, Ontario Power Generation, hospitals, health boards, other provincial agencies, boards and commissions, and colleges and universities across Ontario.

At Ryerson, this includes senior academic and administrative groups including executives, senior directors, deans and vice-provosts, and employees such as administrative secretaries and others workers who are privy to confidential information.

“What I worry about a lot is the sense of unfairness between those that are in bargaining groups and unionized, versus the non-unionized members,” Levy said.

“I think that every (piece of) legislation has got to be seen as fair to everyone, and not have people who are disadvantaged because they can’t bargain collectively.”

The legislation, the Public Sector Compensation Restraint to Protect Public Services Act, was put into effect the day the budget came out on March 25. It will last until March 31, 2012.

“There are people that are at the higher ends of salaries that you could say should be treated differently, but many of our confidential workers and our colleagues in staff positions are at the same salary levels of bargaining members,” Levy said.

Ontario’s current deficit sits at $21 billion. The budget proposes six more years of deficits with an accumulation of a $100-billion debt.

“What they are obviously doing is trying to create a situation under which they are bringing down the expenses of the system in all parts,” he said. “They’re trying to reduce cost.”

According to Levy, there is no formal legislation for unionized or bargaining employees when the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) and Ontario Public Service Employees Union (OPSEU) contracts run out, but the government is asking that unions work towards a wage freeze for upcoming contracts.

CUPE and OPSEU at Ryerson did not comment by press time, but the OPSEU contract ends in June of this year.

Lesley Salvadori, a steward and membership secretary for OPSEU, said there have been no formal discussions.

“That’s something they’ll discuss (with management) during negotiations,” she said.

Levy said it was too soon to talk about potential strikes because the legislation is still unclear.

Larissa Allen, assistant vice-president of human resources at Ryerson, echoed that the legislation is still very unclear.

“I think nobody really knows anything at the moment,” she said. “It’s all very fuzzy and we’re working hard to get the answers.”

Ryerson and other universities in Ontario are collectively putting together questions to pose to the government and will publish the information when they have it.


More from News
Paul Godfrey on politics, sports and luck

Paul Godfrey, CEO of Postmedia Network Inc., speaks at Ryerson.

Published on 2/4/2012 5:28:36 PM
‘Sonian News Byte Feb. 3

 News brief for Feb. 3
- Canada's jobless rate rises by a notch
- 2 Americans, Egyptian abducted in Sinai
- SIU probes fatal shooting on Danforth 

- Giants, Patriots at the Super Bowl

Published on 2/3/2012 1:33:41 PM
News you can use: advice for the future 3

 Katherine Engqvist explores news that students can use as they transition into the real world

Published on 2/3/2012 12:18:14 PM
Ryerson's future refugee students

A refugee student was sponsored in 2009 and 2010, but 2011 came and left without one.

Published on 2/3/2012 12:14:47 PM
A look at the Day of Action protests

Tashika Gomes gives us a second look at the Day of Action protest

Published on 2/2/2012 8:43:29 PM
Comments (1)
Ken writes:
06/22/2010
This is just another bit of maneuvering that will increase tension between non-unionized and unionized staff. In the end neither will see any compensation increases without strike (on the union side). This will be due to fairness considerations enacted by employers. The fact is, at the universities anyway, that administrators and faculty each padded their pockets quite nicely before this announcement (almost as if they knew it was coming)- talk about bargaining in bad faith on both sides of the table - greed trumps when the chips are down.

The motivation on the part of the governent is reasonable enough. More money is needed to support public services and given the aging population the future looks difficult, if not harsh. But in the end if there is no mandate for the private sector to freeze the cost of bread, milk, gasoline, etc, etc, then this so-called restraint act becomes a regression act wherein many families will suffer. It hits working people (unionized and non-unionized) just as such things always have, and the haves do just fine thank-you!
Leave a Comment
Name
Message